[we tried it once with BloodyKitten's guide and then we did it accidentally for some times and now we both are too scared to try doing it again as she started disassogiating and we feared that she would fade out or disappear or something and I am not ready to try it again.]
It was heavily focused on tulpa terminology; maybe it was steering elsewhere, but I didn't notice. It was more of a recommendation than me forcing you guys to move, anyway.
https://tulpa.io/terminologies "For the terms that Tulpa.info uses, this list seems relatively perfect. There absolutely exist terms that we do not use however."
Anyways, regarding terms:
I genuinely don't think there's any ambiguity to what switching is relative to possession in the OG guides, and its pretty much exclusively what everyone else was saying in that discussion
Possession is tulpa use of the body, host can still be in it, varies from just a finger to the whole body
Switching requires the host to be entirely mentally disassociated from the body or otherwise mentally annulled
I think I recall reading on the forum, one person's tulpa smashed his knee into a table and didn't feel a thing cuz he wasn't fronting, just possessing
In our limited experience messing with possession, we had no first-person attachment to the body's senses. We only experienced them insofar as we were immediately aware of them, but we wouldn't have been the ones recoiling in reaction to pain - that'd be Lumi.
11:12 AM
But possession is literally the most different-per-system experience I've ever seen.
Those are total nonsense and entirely arbitrary though
Considering the entropy point (from observation) in most systems tends to be sensory bleedover from the host body because emulated form senses aren't nearly that good
"Possession" and "Full-body possession"(Which often is dropped in favor of the former) are more varied in anecdotal records of what it's like than switching or imposition.
11:13 AM
And switching... is very varied.
11:14 AM
But switching seems to be more a problem of definition for people, while a huge myriad of experiences are all accepted under the umbrella of the term "possession".
From what I can tell, many systems who do full body possession (often simply referring to it as just possession) are practically switching, though most are not.
I really wish I had a direct line to explain to you exactly how much jazz-playing is occurring with the terms here
Like having things that had practical, useful definitions in the early era have been entirely supplanted with new arbitrary meaning that isn't helpful at all... Like tulpas have that same sensory entropy point where you hit the hard reality of how forms work relative to the physical body:
Form senses are at best emulated with relatively iffy fidelity, and are entirely based in a mental state of disassociation we push on tulpas systematically as part of the idea of forms. Reality is less forgiving and it would be very hard to genuinely ignore your body's arm being broken even if you're not relying on body senses primarily
11:21 AM
I also have 0 idea how one possesses without sensory input, at all
Flandre has had direct experience with being very present (but not fronting in any way) while Lumi was in great pain (the greatest he's experienced) without feeling as if it was hers at all.
11:22 AM
Her distress was purely for his well-being (and honestly, practically greater than his own)
I'm willing to chalk up not knowing how one possesses without sensory input by lack of relative personal experience, generally speaking
I also think internalizing the pain as "not mine" doesn't make a difference at all regarding the nature of how the brain is responding to stimulus